← All comparisons
Payapps alternative

The SiteLive alternative to Payapps

Payapps standardises progress claim submission and assessment between builders and subcontractors — a solid claims workflow layer. If you're evaluating alternatives for progress claims & payment schedules, here is what SiteLive does differently — fairly stated, so you can choose with your eyes open.

Why teams look for a Payapps alternative

Most teams don't switch because their current tool is bad — they switch because the work outgrows it. The common thread we hear: records live in one system, the programme in another, the claim in a third, and nothing proves anything when a dispute lands. SiteLive was built as one operating system where the records generate themselves from the work and stand up as evidence.

What Payapps does well

  • Structured claim submission/assessment
  • SOPA-aware workflows
  • Builder–subbie collaboration

What SiteLive does differently

  • The claim produces itself from confirmed work — this period = to-date − previously claimed, computed from the ledger
  • Every line links to timestamped evidence: photos, captures, sign-ons, dockets
  • Claims render in your client's own template and replay inside the 3D model
  • The same system that ran the work substantiates the claim — no re-keying into a claims portal

Try it against your current setup

The honest way to evaluate an alternative is side by side on a live job. SiteLive's 7-day free trial gives you the full platform — set up a project, run a week of sign-ons, bookings and captures, and see what the records look like at the end of it.

Start your 7-day free trial

This page is offered in good faith from public information — Payapps is good at what it was built for, and many teams run both. For a feature-by-feature view, read SiteLive vs Payapps. If anything here is out of date, tell us and we'll correct it.